The Web browser scene has heated up recently, thanks to recent releases such as Google's Chrome, Mozilla's Firefox 3 and the Windows version of Apple's Safari. Considering how entwined the Web is with our daily lives, I'm surprised we don't have more so-called browser wars, as companies compete for top interface.
Personally, I love browser wars because the ultimate interface has yet to appear, so the more competition there is, the more likely someone will finally get it right. No matter who wins, it's the end users who reap the rewards, so it's in our best interest to keep challenging the status quo.
The wants and needs of end users also can be fickle. We demand browsers that can have it both ways: clean and fast but loaded with extras, attributes at odds in the current crop of browsers. Firefox 3 might come closest to attaining the ideal blend of speed and functionality.
Lean browsers cut through the Web like a racing bike, pared down for least resistance and maximum speed. Fat browsers, on the other hand, can piggyback so many add-ons that they become lumbering, top- heavy heaps, barely able to turn corners without crashing.
They are advantages and drawbacks for both styles of browser design. Being too lean means the browser is limited in scope and not exactly feature-rich. It's one thing to eschew the overuse of add- ons but another to be missing out on some genuinely worthwhile Web tools and widgets.
On the other hand, too many add-ons and plug-ins can lead to severe browser bloat, evidenced by impaired performance, frequent lockups and a host of other errors and inconveniences.
Although they all function the same, Web browsers tend to be more of a personal choice, based on everything from cosmetic appearance to feature set. Many users take this stuff a little...

More... (http://www.toptechnews.com/story.xhtml?story_id=61928)