View Single Post
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
rice4lyfe is Offline
Veteran
rice4lyfe is on a distinguished road
 
rice4lyfe's Avatar
 
Posts: 114
Credits: 0
Spent time on board: -
Join Date: Aug 2004
Reputation: 20
Rep Power: 5
   
Default 02-02-2007, 03:33 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by FraterPerdurabo View Post
In which case is a WW sin better than a regular BvC?
Assassins have:
less +hp gain per level and per +VIT
no Leap
slower FCR% breakpoints
less WW damage
cannot use Grief
list goes on forever.

Try to name one duel in which a WW sin would be a better option instead of a BvC.

Now WW/Trap hybrid sin is kickass, but WW sin alone really sucks.
Yes, I agree and respect your fact that a BVC/BVB's genuine WW is better than a WW sin's "artificial" WW. Yes, I know BVC/BVBs can own WW sins with ease, but if you think about the purpose of a WW sin, its not made to defeat barbs. It is made to defeat casters. I'm sure every character have their weaknesses, like how a sorc's weakness is the druid. If you are skilled with a WW sin, you can probaby own most casters. But, I do agree that no matter how skilled you are with a WW sin, you can never beat a barb.

I just want you understand that a ww sin is not shit, thats it. There is a point for ww sins, and there are some good points of a pure ww sin. If you still think WW sin's are shit, then there is nothing I can do, but respect your ideas.
  
Reply With Quote